Forces Reunited
Current Members: 1,579,891  
 
 
    HOME    
FORCES WAR RECORDS
 FORCES SHOP 
FORCES DATING
FORCES DISCOUNTS

Community
  >> Search >> Home


You are not logged in. Click here to login or click here to register.

Turn off these pesky adverts! - What is this?
Get a FREE "Proud to be a Forces veteran" Badge
Show how proud you are to be a Forces Veteran with your free badge.
Click Here Now!

Forces Reunited - Falklands War: UK and Argentina mark invasion 30 years on
www.forcesreunited.org.uk >> Topical News >> Topical News Items >> Falklands War: UK and Argentina mark invasion 30 years on
Forces Reunited Forums
>> Post New Topic
<< Prev 1 2 3 [4]
AuthorTopic
Colin Hall
Add Forum Tag





Membership Level: Full
Posts: 2605
Status: Offline



Just in passing....!

The Argentine Government formally protested against Britain’s occupation of the Islands in 1833, 1834, 1841, 1842, and 1849, in the latter year sending a note to the British Government indicating that, although not intending to protest any further in view of Britain’s inattention to her protests, Argentine silence should not be interpreted as acquiescence.Britain sought in 1955 to institute proceedings at the International Court of Justice [The Hague] both against Argentina and Chile concerning their respective claims to sovereignty over the Falkand Island Dependencies and British Antarctic Territory, but neither the Argentine nor the Chilean governments agrees to accept the jurisdiction of the Court...[probably because the outcome was clear - the titles would be formally ceded to Britain].

And finally,  (1983):

A State, in order to acquire title to territory from another State by prescription, must exercise effective control over that territory for a long period The UK has clearly satisfied this requirement...[which should be] accompanied by acquiescence by the ’losing State.

Argentina has claimed that it has protested over the years, but apart from the invasion in 1982 [an action against international law], Argentina has never sought arbitration or taken further diplomatic steps, such as breaking off diplomatic relations with Britain. Moreover, within the doctrine of intertemporal law, conquest establishing title in 1833 is accepted as legitimate.

So, let Argentina take it to arbitration (not bilateral talks) and see how, err, successful they might be in gaining the Islands back, lawfully this time.

The answer is they don’t have a claim,. and all the brou-hah is just that, Sabre -rattling because she wants to divert attention from the state of the Argentine economy. Add to that the Argentina doesn’t have the military means to land troops and would suffer if they tried, so we can all go back to sleep!
   
Report Post
05/04/2012 05:28:13
                                                   >> Edit This Post >> Quote This Post
Alan Mudge
Add Forum Tag



Membership Level: Full
Posts: 41
Status: Offline
Whatho John Boy,

Re. your post of the 03/04, just reporting it as it was said on the BBC News old chap.

But lets face facts, rent-a-crowd left wingers are good at stirring it up all over the world. The foot soldiers carrying out their leaders wishes.

If you’re a passive left winger, that’s your democratic right in our (at the moment) democratic country. Likewise you have the right to protest in a peaceful manner if you are so inclined.

Since you’ve worn the uniform and sworn allegiance to HMQ, I assume you’re a passive supporter and also a staunch supporter of Ed Minibrain’s Labour party. Or is the "Red Flag" No.1 in your musical hit parade?

Toodle Pip.
Report Post
05/04/2012 08:22:55
                                                   >> Edit This Post >> Quote This Post
Owen Hunter
Add Forum Tag





Membership Level: Full
Posts: 1430
Status: Offline
More dates.

Has anyone read the "History of the Malvinas Islands"?    Depends on who’s history you believe.

Morality is doing what’s right regardless of what you’re told. Obedience is doing what you’re told regardless of what’s right....What is right is not always popular, and what is popular is not always right.
Report Post
05/04/2012 09:57:17
                                                   >> Edit This Post >> Quote This Post
John (scouse) Hirons
"The Dingbat"





Membership Level: Full
Posts: 9891
Status: Offline

Quoting: Alan Mudge
Whatho John Boy,

Re. your post of the 03/04, just reporting it as it was said on the BBC News old chap.

If you’re a passive left winger, that’s your democratic right in our (at the moment) democratic country. Likewise you have the right to protest in a peaceful manner if you are so inclined.

But lets face facts, rent-a-crowd left wingers are good at stirring it up all over the world. The foot soldiers carrying out their leaders wishes.


Since you’ve worn the uniform and sworn allegiance to HMQ, I assume you’re a passive supporter and also a staunch supporter of Ed Minibrain’s Labour party. Or is the "Red Flag" No.1 in your musical hit parade?

Toodle Pip.




Alright Alan, I have no idea what a "passive left winger" is, is it anything like a passive right winger only with a social conscience & the ability to think?

 I have never been on a protest march, I leave that to the right wing inspired rent a mob. I do, however, note that you used the the words "If you’re a passive left winger, that’s your democratic right in our (at the moment) country" I take it that you & the rest of your right wing cronies expect left of center parties to be banned by the neo-fascist right wing.

 As for me supporting New Labour, you haven’t done much reading on this site have you? I have stated on numerous occasions that I’m old Labour the new ones are in the political stance of the old Tory Party before both parties shifted further to the right.

  Just to confuse your rather narrow view of the world, I’m a socialist & I’m also a ’red’ hot Monarchist but if you had actually bothered to read posts on FR you would have already known that.

  A little bit of advice, it’s best to know what your talking about it will stop you looking foolish. A little bit of research would have saved you from making erroneous claims & statements.  

A situation may be desperate but never serious
Report Post
05/04/2012 12:50:39
                                                   >> Edit This Post >> Quote This Post
<< Prev 1 2 3 [4]
>> Reply To This Post
Moderated By: Murray Whyte,Edward Bishop
Users Here:
REGISTER
LOGIN
FIND FRIENDS
MILITARY NEWS
CAMPAIGNS
REUNIONS
GALLERY
FORUMS
CHAT ROOM
REMEMBRANCE
HONOUR ROLL
TESTIMONIALS
MEMORIES
COMPETITIONS
ADVERTISE
MEDIA CENTRE
WHO'S ONLINE?
AFFILIATES
FAQ/CONTACT US
ABOUT US
BLOG
BOOKMARK US
HOME
Recommend this page to a friend.
Your Name:
Friends Name:
Friends Email:

This site uses cookies. For information on this, please see our privacy policy

About Contact Us Advertise Military Records New Members Terms Military Genealogy Sitemap